September 6, 2016 – Moral Fibers

Already the independent moral is characterized for the igualitria contribution, where the mutual respect is preponderant factor and where feelings of the good and responsibilities sprout (PIAGET, apud PUIG, 1998). Therefore, the rules are decurrent of a cooperative and dialgico work, what rare the educational one occurs in modern societies that live exhaustingly for the work, without time for the social one and. The anomie, absence of norms or rules, that, according to Piaget, last since the birth until the five or six years of age, do not favor the child to accept that all game or trick and, therefore, all social relation if structure in rules. For Piaget the child, in this phase, needs affection, ternura, affection, understanding of not, the clear limits, the coherence in the affectivity that it delivery. The binomial delivers/collection implies in the ticket of the more important and essential moral recital, that is of the security. Of gradual form, the moral realism of the EGO is surpassed next to the representacional egocentrismo, therefore from the moment that the child starts to decide for proper itself, understanding and analyzing the rules in a perspective of universal, independent validity of the immediate ideas, it starts to be independent.

… The development of the morality walks in the direction of the construction of periods of training of autonomy, when the citizen understands that the source of the rules is in proper itself, in its capacity as legislator of the rules, but always if relating in the other. (Arajo, 1999, P. 32) FINAL CONSIDERAES Are evident that the requirements of the SUPEREGO if almost always oppose to the desires of the ID. This conflict happens directly in the EGO, since as much the ID as SUPEREGO look for to format the EGO in accordance with its proper requirements or desires. Normally what the EGO makes is to look one commitment solution satisfies that them, even so partially. A mature EGO normally obtains to find this formula conciliatory, which, so that she is really valid, must also have in account the ambient reality. For Freud (1999), the personality basically consists of this conflict between the instinctive desires and the interiorizadas norms of the society.

Conflict this that, if uncurls in the great scene consisting of the mutual relation between the EGO and the ambient reality. The present article objectified to present aspects of the moral development of the EGO in the individual. However, the morality is not a value that is born with the child, before, is a system of rules acquired e, therefore, its construction is purely social. Exactly for this fact it is that if it becomes difficult a necessary analysis of what results of the content of the rules and what comes from the respect of the child for its parents or society.

Where it starts and until where the ethics go; in ethical terms the religion turns toward the education and the perfectioning of the man who searchs the sanctity of God. He is well-known that it, the religion, has, brought a great moral progress for the humanity; therefore its theological concepts strengthen its interpretation. The ethical ideals in turn, remake the idea of living in harmony with the nature attempting against for the criteria of the morality and the reason and the freedom, that consists of the preservation of the rights of the man as an agent in the organization process, not being it, therefore exempt of the fulfilment of its duties nor other people’s to its rights for the equality between all, longing for a social life more joust and more human being, a true concern with the future. However, a ethical-social reflection of our days it characterizes the alarming moment where all the advance became moral, therefore it does not have participation; thus being the ethics one becomes impossible ahead of the freedom and of the fatality, but, it does not have what it does not finish esbarrando in the ethics, that are come back here toward the dominador God. In the presented text some philosophers point themselves whose concern with the ethics and to decide the contradictions between: necessity x possibility; time x eternity: individual social x; economic moral x; corporal psychic x; natural cultural x; intelligence x will. Mark and kierkegaard present two contributions for these times: for mark the action human being is defined in work and technique, not accepting the domain of the man for the proper man, in the second present o must be understood as the instant of the decision; the good and the evil now come to describe the moral behavior that still is defined in moral conscience; its autonomy for intermediary knowing itself that for each one situation it exists attitudes to be taken e, each one of them take in account the ethical language. To act eticamente is to act well and not badly, not having, therefore to be distracted how much to this choice; yes to act normally, with respect to attitudes it points three where concrete ethics do not ignore: ' ' The family: demonstrating to the great latent reformularization necessity in what parents x dirigem themselves to the relationship children; rights and the duties of all componentes.' ' The civil society: it appears portraying the picture clamorous of the social injustice: where it has wealth of few and poverty of many; domain, power and I privilege, the work and the property pertinentes.&#039 is factors; ' State: it presents great problems of inaquality between the social classrooms; exploration. Therefore the medias contribute for the passivity of the citizen when only it hears not having the chance to interact and to participate, thus each time is felt more impotent. Therefore, never it discards the flowing possibilities of an awareness that will be extended by means of society cultures values morality – to be ethical religion consciences freedom duties reality

Daily Archives: September 6, 2016

Superego

Humanity